Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Endodontic Applications: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The development of dedicated coils and new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences has led to an increase in image resolution and a reduction in artifacts. Consequently, numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of MRI as a nonionizing alternative to cone-beam computed tomographic imaging. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in clinical applications in endodontics. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies evaluating MRI applications in endodontics, covering tooth and root canal anatomy, root canal working length, pulp vitality and regeneration, the effect of caries on dental pulp, guided endodontics, periapical lesions, and root cracks/fractures. The selected studies examined both ex vivo and in vivo human teeth using clinical MRI units. Two researchers independently screened the studies, applied the eligibility criteria, and assessed the potential risk of bias using the revised QUADAS-2 tool (Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK). RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were included in this systematic review, demonstrating that the use of MRI has a high diagnostic value in endodontics. In the evaluation of tooth and root canal anatomy, pulp vitality and regeneration, the effect of caries on dental pulp, periapical lesions, and root cracks/fractures, MRI's accuracy is comparable to or even higher than reference standards such as cone-beam computed tomographic imaging, micro-computed tomographic imaging, and histology. CONCLUSIONS: MRI has high potential accuracy for diagnosing various clinical endodontic tasks, except for root canal length, size of caries, and periapical lesion dimensions, which are overestimated in MRI.

Evaluation of Different Techniques and Materials for Filling in 3-dimensional Printed Teeth Replicas with Perforating Internal Resorption by Means of Micro-Computed Tomography.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the filling ability of 2 obturation techniques in 3-dimensional (3D) printed teeth with perforating internal resorption (PIR). METHODS: A maxillary central incisor was instrumented and scanned by micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging. The 3D model was exported in the stereolithographic format and, with the aid of OrtogOnBlender software (Cícero Moraes, Sinop, SP, Brazil), a PIR in the middle third of the root canal was designed. Thirty-two replicas were printed in surgical resin and distributed into 4 groups (n = 8) according to the obturation technique and the material used: 2 groups used the hybrid technique, 1 with Bio-C Sealer (BCS; Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil)/gutta-percha (GP; VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) + Bio-C Repair (BCR; Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) and the other with BioRoot (BR; Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France)/gutta-percha (GP) + Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France), and 2 groups used the incremental technique, 1 with BCR and the other with BD. Postobturation micro-CT imaging was performed to measure the percentage volume of voids and laser confocal microscopy to measure the surface roughness (µm) of the repair cements. Data were compared using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Regarding the filling volume in the apical third, the BCS/GP + BCR (89.70 ± 5.15), BR/GP + BD (87.70 ± 8.43), and BCR (84.20 ± 9.00) groups showed the highest percentages compared with the BD group (69.70 ± 6.88) (P < .05). In the area of internal resorption, the BCS/GP + BCR (96.00 ± 2.64) and BCR (95.30 ± 2.93) groups showed the highest percentages compared with the BR/GP + BD group (91.50 ± 1.35) (P < .05). The BD group showed intermediate values that were sometimes similar to the BCS/GP + BCR and BCR groups and similar to the BR/GP + BD group (P > .05). Regarding the quality of the filling in the perforation area, the BCR group showed better results compared with the BD group (P < .001). Regarding roughness, the BCR group (1.66 ± 0.65) showed lower surface roughness compared with the BD group (2.51 ± 0.89) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The capacity and quality of the filling in teeth with PIR were superior with the incremental technique with BCR and the hybrid technique with BCS/GP + BCR.